Flash of Steel header image 1

Games vs Story Generation Devices

August 10th, 2012 by Troy Goodfellow · Board Games

We had the Civic Holiday meetup on the past Saturday, and it was, as usual, a good group. A healthy dose of regulars and newcomers, and Julian won Risk Legacy again, so he is exiled, etc. Again, thanks to Tequila Bookworm for hosting us – and for 8 hours this time, too.

The first game on the docket was Last Night on Earth, a game we’d been introduced to in an earlier session, but this time we had the full six people to play it and Dave, the game’s owner, served as a referee of sorts to resolve rules issues.

If you haven’t played Last Night on Earth, it’s a zombie game – one of the dozens that clutter the Ameritrash market like Battle of Bulge games at the height of wargaming success. In a full game, you have four people playing ‘heroes’ and two people playing the zombies. There are multiple scenarios, all with turn limits, and both sides roll dice and draw cards to determine what actions they can take when.

I would be lying if I said I didn’t get into the game a little. I was the only adult with three other teenage heroes, and my power (drawing an extra card and then choosing which to discard) was the most useful. This made me a target, yes. But it also gave me the illusion of something to do.

Because, as much as Last Night on Earth is about survival, it is more about luck. This is a game that lives and dies on the die rolls. You roll dice to move, you roll dice to see if your attacks work, you roll dice to see if your weapon breaks or if you can escape certain card generated situations.

Now, clearly, a bad decision at any point can cost you the game. But, given the team nature of the game, these have to be bad decisions that everyone agrees on and co-operates with. The only really bad decisions you can make are related to how you group your heroes for a given mission. In truth, Last Night on Earth is a choose your own adventure story but with rolling the bones to see which page you turn to.

This does not mean you cannot get good stories out of them.

I talk a lot on this blog about how a great strategy game is one of the most powerful interactive narrative inspirations available today. Everyone who plays Mass Effect sees the same stuff 95% of the time, but every Civilization game has the potential for something original and epic. Fighting off a horde of Zerg in Starcraft is qualitatively different from fighting off a horde of attackers in Gears of War – one is purely skill and guts, and one is plot driven. Note, I am not saying that one form is superior to the other – simply that giving players the chance to write their own new stories, freed from the author’s pen, is a marvelous thing that strategy games provide.

Ideally, a good board game should provide that, too. But then you throw in the dice roll. And not just any dice roll – the obvious dice roll, where everyone can see the results and curse the fates.

I am not sure who coined the term “story generation device” but I am sure I first heard it from the mouth of Bruce Geryk when we talked about Memoir ’44. Like zombies, World War II is a familiar theme and readily accessible to any player. And, like Last Night on Earth, for something to be a clear strategic error, the sort of thing you note as ?? in chess, it has to be fairly obvious to pretty much everyone independent of subsequent die rolls.

Still, How the Fates Ruined My Life is a tale as old as time. For the Greeks, Fates meant inevitability and destiny and I hear this in the tones of some board gamers as well – that the dice were cursed or turned against the roller or, in many cases, the randomness of the result is retconned into a winning/losing strategy. As if any D6 roll is more important to the laws of physics than any other.

The result are games like Last Night on Earth which can serve as decent story building exercises as you play, or when you play again and want to refer to a previous instance, but aren’t very fulfilling when you want to talk about choices or options. True, randomness is important in most games, both video and board. Deck building games rely on not knowing what is next turned up, wargames rely on the roll of many dice over dozens of situations (mitigating randomness somewhat) and if it’s a game with a randomly created map then you might be hosed before you start.

There was a discussion on a recent podcast about the distinction between a Fun game and Good game, and I sometimes think that Fun often comes down to the whole story generating thing. If you are having fun playing something or interacting with other people then the stories will come easy. You are lost in the moment or in the flow.

But a lot of fun is sometimes empty calories. One night stands, cheap bourbon, episodes of Benson…things that leave you with little else besides the endorphine hit.

Let’s be clear — not every game has to be edifying or interesting or challenging. I am perfectly happy playing my roguelikes knowing that there is a 1 in 1000 chance that I will get dragon armour on level 2, and a corresponding likelihood to be murdered by a steam dragon. Unfairness and bad rolls are something we deal with as gamers.

But Last Night on Earth feels like some very empty calories. With good people (as I was) and with good beer (as I was) it can be an interesting experience. But not nearly as fulfilling as Risk Legacy and realizing that I can save this battle if I spend my scar now instead of later, or as interesting as a late game decision in Ticket to Ride to draw Route Cards in the hope to close the point gap. Yes, there is randomness in each of these, but the choices are also starker and tougher. The decision to move or to search in Last Night on Earth is almost entirely determined by the scenario that is chosen and how many hit points you have left.

In short, every moment in Last Night on Earth, just like almost every moment in Memoir ’44, is divorced from real tension because so much is out of your control, and out of the control of your mindless opponents. It’s a decent game to build a tale with (I could tell you about how my drifter took a risk to save the high school kids, but their dice rolls got them out of danger after he exposed himself, for example) but it pleases momentarily and then fades until we are reminded of it again. Any lessons you learn are game specific, unless you learn that redneck towns still have sexy nurse uniforms.

I’m not saying I would never play it again. I’m not saying it’s a bad experience. I am saying that, mechanics wise, even the most stylish Ameritrash game like Last Night on Earth isn’t that far removed from Sorry! or other Milton Bradley stuff; the real difference is the narrative tools imposed upon it.

→ 4 CommentsTags:

Three Moves Ahead Episode 180 – Thinking Machines

August 6th, 2012 by Rob Zacny · Podcast, Three Moves Ahead

ThreeMovesAhead

Soren Johnson and Cryptic Comet’s Vic Davis return to talk with Julian and Rob about artificial intelligence, its limitations, and their changing views on what to do about it.

Listen

Discussion

RSS here.
Subscribe on iTunes.

→ 1 CommentTags:

Weekend Meetup Details

August 2nd, 2012 by Troy Goodfellow · Blogs, Board Games, Me, Three Moves Ahead

So despite trying to find a spot that would guarantee some quiet and isolation but also food if necessary, it looks like the Saturday boardgame meetup will be at the usual place.

Tequila Bookworm
512 Queen Street West, Toronto, Canada
11 AM to 7 PM
Saturday, August 4

A few notes:

First, they open at 11 AM, so if you are too early, you can’t just sit around.
Second, the streetcars on Spadina are closed while they fix the tracks, so it’s all buses if you relied on that mode of transport (like I did)
Third, no obligation to be there for it all and I know that a couple of regular attendees and a new one won’t be able to come to mid afternoon.
Fourth, bring cameras and take pictures. We have a good group.
Fifth, everyone in the area is welcome if they like games and people.

Still. Come and let’s play games.

→ 3 CommentsTags:

Three Moves Ahead Episode 179 – Spy Games

July 30th, 2012 by Rob Zacny · Podcast, Three Moves Ahead, Uncategorized

ThreeMovesAhead

Soren Johnson returns to talk spies, espionage, and covert action with Rob and Julian. They then subject espionage mechanics to forty minutes of interrogation, torture, and unkind words. Then they remember the one game they’ve played that has spies and espionage that they don’t hate. Suspiciously, Rob’s microphone fails midway through the show. Happenstance or sabotage from an enemy agent?

Listen

Discussion

RSS here.
Subscribe on iTunes.

Comments Off on Three Moves Ahead Episode 179 – Spy GamesTags:

A Little Light Reading

July 24th, 2012 by Troy Goodfellow · Books

As anyone that has gone through the dissertation process knows, one of the great fears of every graduate student is getting halfway through a research project and then seeing a dissertation published at another school on a topic very close to if not identical to your own. At the very least, it means adding one more giant source to your literature review, but it also means that any possibility of a book contract afterwards is limited and that, even worse, you aren’t nearly as clever as you think you are.

Having spent a lot of my life surrounded by university politics and personalities, this really doesn’t change much even once you leave grad school, but once you have tenure or research leaves or assistants to help pore through the crap, it takes some of the sting out of being scooped.

So when I was approached to read and review Jon Peterson’s Playing At The World: A History of Simulating Wars, People and Fantastic Adventures From Chess To Role Playing Games, some of the old panic came back.

After all, I have the outline of a dozen books about the evolution of strategy games – what if Mr. Peterson beat me to the punch?

Well, the book finally arrived today, and he hasn’t, but it is over 600 pages plus another 100 of bibliography and index. This is a very, very serious piece of work. Just scanning it I see footnotes that cite The Book of Exodus, Ovid, every major wargame magazine of the 70s and the Chainmail rule book. I know nothing about Jon Peterson, those his website address hints that he is a fellow Canadian. He is certainly thorough and well read.

The book isn’t out for the public yet, and I have an advance copy. I’ll review it as fairly and honestly as I would any other product. Many readers probably forget, but back when Crispy Gamer wasn’t an eyesore and was well edited and well staffed and well paying, I had a monthly column devoted to books and movies related to games. So this will be old hat for me and a lot of fun.

And a helluva lot of reading. Taking this monster to Second Cup or Starbucks will certainly make me fit in with the students that populate my neighborhood.

I’ll report back when I’ve finished reading it and have composed my thoughts.

And I also need to write my own book much, much faster.

→ 9 CommentsTags:

Three Moves Ahead Episode 178: Unit Customization and Game Design

July 23rd, 2012 by Troy Goodfellow · Design, Indie Games, Sci Fi, Three Moves Ahead

ThreeMovesAhead

Sixth Beatle Soren Johnson returns along with new guest, Cliff Harris from Positech – designer of Gratuitous Space Battles and the new Gratuitous Tank Battles. This week, how does the idea of unit customization fit with general design principles? At what point is this mechanic an intrusion into good 4x game design? Where do designer and player expectations collide?

Listen

Rob’s column on this issue at Gamespy

Discussion

RSS here.
Subscribe on iTunes.

Comments Off on Three Moves Ahead Episode 178: Unit Customization and Game DesignTags: