It’s the end of June, so it’s time to look back at the first six months of 2008 and see how the genre is doing. Frankly, it hasn’t been a great six months. We’ve had a lot of expansions and a few original titles, but not much in the way of new games.<\/p>\n
The good thing about that is that it makes my job that much easier.<\/p>\n
3) Galactic Civilizations: Twilight of the Arnor<\/strong>: It wouldn’t be a summary list without a GalCiv game on it. This final expansion to Stardock’s 4x space game doesn’t really do the type of re-exploration that most of my favorite expansions have, but it does add a considerable about of polish and energy to the game. With unique techs and unique structures for every race, playing the Yor is now a very different experience from playing the Terrans. Though Stardock still has a way to go in making all the information available when and where you need it, Arnor is major upgrade in the GalCiv<\/em> series in all respects. If you aren’t playing with this expansion, you’re not playing the game right.<\/p>\n 2) Europa Universalis III: In Nomine<\/strong>: Another expansion, but one that takes the opposite approach, redoing a lot of core concepts and game play mechanics in a manner that finally fixes most of my complaints about the game. It is now harder for a couple of superstates to dominate the world. Decisions and missions add direction and distinctiveness to every major nation. Paradox does need to do something with rebels; even a short war can, with some bad luck, lead to decades of crippling revolts, keeping many AI rivals from being threats. But IN is a wonderful expansion and a promising sign from a company that delivered the very disappointing EU: Rome<\/em> earlier this year. Here’s hoping that the first expansion for that game is a free apology that adds something special. Because, as much as I love ancient history, I haven’t touched Rome<\/em> since In Nomine<\/em> came out.<\/p>\n 1) Sins of a Solar Empire<\/strong>: I haven’t written a lot about Sins of a Solar Empire<\/em>, mostly because everyone else was writing what I wanted to say. Sins is an original title with an original take on both 4x and RTS mechanics. It moves at a stately pace, but forces you to be ready for action at a moment’s notice. The small differences between the three factions are enough to make playing each one a little different, but they are similar enough for you to just jump in. The multiplayer system is great. Ironclad decided to just let the game speak for itself, with no ludicrous back story or plot focused scenario campaign. Sins is the ultimate rejoinder to people who complain no one makes games like they used to, because I can easily imagine this coming out in 1992. Though it wouldn’t have looked so nice.<\/p>\n Civilization: Revolution<\/em> is ineligible for these awards because UK releases don’t count in my world, but I’m hearing some great things about it. Same with Grigsby’s new Civil War game.<\/p>\n Blog wise, 2008 was a year of steady growth. The series I did on Roman themed games was picked up by Kotaku<\/a> and Rock, Paper, Shotgun<\/a> (those guys are very friendly about linking to here for some reason) and so was, by far, the most widely read thing from the first six months. I regret not getting the rest of my 1960 game with Bruce<\/a> posted, but it’s been difficult to write up the AAR with so much other stuff going on. I’ll try to finish it all before E3, though. I like doing these AAR\/post-mortems, and hope to do more in the future. Maybe with a proper computer wargame or something. Fraps can save me from forgetting to take screenshots. But there is something about boardgaming that makes this sort of thing different and appealing.<\/p>\n