<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The CGM Archives</title>
	<atom:link href="http://flashofsteel.com/index.php/2009/10/07/the-cgm-archives/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://flashofsteel.com/index.php/2009/10/07/the-cgm-archives/</link>
	<description>The Best Strategy Game Blog in My House</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 Feb 2012 23:46:22 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tiffany Martin</title>
		<link>http://flashofsteel.com/index.php/2009/10/07/the-cgm-archives/comment-page-1/#comment-222268</link>
		<dc:creator>Tiffany Martin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Oct 2009 03:45:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://flashofsteel.com/?p=1826#comment-222268</guid>
		<description>If it&#039;s any help I also want to volunteer this link to the search because it&#039;s cumbersome to find it.
&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.cgonline.com/search/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Search Link&lt;/a&gt;

The search is sucky, and the only way I found any of the articles was by looking through my game stacks and checking individual games I recall reviewing. Of course, some of them are not up (too old).

I&#039;m just so happy that there&#039;s something out there to remember our work at CGM even if it is clunky and incomplete.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If it&#8217;s any help I also want to volunteer this link to the search because it&#8217;s cumbersome to find it.<br />
<a href="http://www.cgonline.com/search/" rel="nofollow" target="_blank" class="liexternal">Search Link</a></p>
<p>The search is sucky, and the only way I found any of the articles was by looking through my game stacks and checking individual games I recall reviewing. Of course, some of them are not up (too old).</p>
<p>I&#8217;m just so happy that there&#8217;s something out there to remember our work at CGM even if it is clunky and incomplete.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Primemover</title>
		<link>http://flashofsteel.com/index.php/2009/10/07/the-cgm-archives/comment-page-1/#comment-222002</link>
		<dc:creator>Primemover</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Oct 2009 01:17:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://flashofsteel.com/?p=1826#comment-222002</guid>
		<description>&quot;Thanks for the heads up! Though it makes me sad… because the stuff linked there is so much better than much of what you can read today, especially on the web.&quot;

I echo that statement!  The cliche of &quot;this brings back memories of the good old days&quot; applies here.  The transition from paper to electronic was inevitable, but there is something about reading computer stuff in a magazine.  I do not know if that should be viewed as an irony or a paradox.  Mostly the reasons for missing the magazines like CGM, CGW/GFW, and PC Gamer (back before they downsized) is the quality of the material.  You knew there was intelligent and relevant thought in those articles, and that is not an indictment now on the quality of the work of those writers who went from paper to electronic (not their fault the magazines folded or voluntarily chose to go electronic). It just felt more tangible and frankly, it was something to look forward to in the mailbox every month.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Thanks for the heads up! Though it makes me sad… because the stuff linked there is so much better than much of what you can read today, especially on the web.&#8221;</p>
<p>I echo that statement!  The cliche of &#8220;this brings back memories of the good old days&#8221; applies here.  The transition from paper to electronic was inevitable, but there is something about reading computer stuff in a magazine.  I do not know if that should be viewed as an irony or a paradox.  Mostly the reasons for missing the magazines like CGM, CGW/GFW, and PC Gamer (back before they downsized) is the quality of the material.  You knew there was intelligent and relevant thought in those articles, and that is not an indictment now on the quality of the work of those writers who went from paper to electronic (not their fault the magazines folded or voluntarily chose to go electronic). It just felt more tangible and frankly, it was something to look forward to in the mailbox every month.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dave Long</title>
		<link>http://flashofsteel.com/index.php/2009/10/07/the-cgm-archives/comment-page-1/#comment-221988</link>
		<dc:creator>Dave Long</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Oct 2009 19:01:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://flashofsteel.com/?p=1826#comment-221988</guid>
		<description>Quirky search is right! I was able to find a bunch of stuff I did, though. Going to have to link everything up eventually at my currently dormant blog.

Thanks for the heads up! Though it makes me sad... because the stuff linked there is so much better than much of what you can read today, especially on the web. :(</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Quirky search is right! I was able to find a bunch of stuff I did, though. Going to have to link everything up eventually at my currently dormant blog.</p>
<p>Thanks for the heads up! Though it makes me sad&#8230; because the stuff linked there is so much better than much of what you can read today, especially on the web. :(</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Scott</title>
		<link>http://flashofsteel.com/index.php/2009/10/07/the-cgm-archives/comment-page-1/#comment-221978</link>
		<dc:creator>Scott</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Oct 2009 14:15:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://flashofsteel.com/?p=1826#comment-221978</guid>
		<description>Good find!  Did the CGW archives all end up online?  Last time I checked, they were missing a number of years, including my &#039;golden years&#039; of the early 90&#039;s.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good find!  Did the CGW archives all end up online?  Last time I checked, they were missing a number of years, including my &#8216;golden years&#8217; of the early 90&#8242;s.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

