<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Majesty 2 Review</title>
	<atom:link href="http://flashofsteel.com/index.php/2009/09/15/majesty-2-review/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://flashofsteel.com/index.php/2009/09/15/majesty-2-review/</link>
	<description>The Best Strategy Game Blog in My House</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 21 May 2012 20:36:05 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Punning Pundit</title>
		<link>http://flashofsteel.com/index.php/2009/09/15/majesty-2-review/comment-page-1/#comment-220852</link>
		<dc:creator>Punning Pundit</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Sep 2009 17:51:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://flashofsteel.com/?p=1781#comment-220852</guid>
		<description>I can&#039;t believe I missed the first sentence :(</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I can&#8217;t believe I missed the first sentence :(</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: LintMan</title>
		<link>http://flashofsteel.com/index.php/2009/09/15/majesty-2-review/comment-page-1/#comment-220848</link>
		<dc:creator>LintMan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Sep 2009 17:28:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://flashofsteel.com/?p=1781#comment-220848</guid>
		<description>I hadn&#039;t played the original game, but took a chance on preordering Majesty 2 on Steam, which gave the original and its expansion out for free as a bonus.

Majesty felt like an old game for me.  Really old, like pre-Starcraft, instead of 2000.  Interesting for a little while, but aside from the difficulty, the missions felt like you were just doing the same stuff every time.   I pretty much lost interest in continuing before I finished the main game or got to the expansion.

Now that I&#039;ve played Majesty, I&#039;m kinda disappointed to read that a lot of what I didn&#039;t care for about it wasn&#039;t really fixed or improved upon in Majesty 2.  I guess I&#039;ll find out soon enough.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I hadn&#8217;t played the original game, but took a chance on preordering Majesty 2 on Steam, which gave the original and its expansion out for free as a bonus.</p>
<p>Majesty felt like an old game for me.  Really old, like pre-Starcraft, instead of 2000.  Interesting for a little while, but aside from the difficulty, the missions felt like you were just doing the same stuff every time.   I pretty much lost interest in continuing before I finished the main game or got to the expansion.</p>
<p>Now that I&#8217;ve played Majesty, I&#8217;m kinda disappointed to read that a lot of what I didn&#8217;t care for about it wasn&#8217;t really fixed or improved upon in Majesty 2.  I guess I&#8217;ll find out soon enough.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: GB</title>
		<link>http://flashofsteel.com/index.php/2009/09/15/majesty-2-review/comment-page-1/#comment-220839</link>
		<dc:creator>GB</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Sep 2009 14:42:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://flashofsteel.com/?p=1781#comment-220839</guid>
		<description>Where is Three Moves Ahead 30?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Where is Three Moves Ahead 30?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Erez</title>
		<link>http://flashofsteel.com/index.php/2009/09/15/majesty-2-review/comment-page-1/#comment-220836</link>
		<dc:creator>Erez</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Sep 2009 14:16:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://flashofsteel.com/?p=1781#comment-220836</guid>
		<description>Having read the review, I have to say: wow, Troy. You addressed each and every point I needed addressed for me to make the judgment whether to get this one or not. It is complete, concise, and clear. Great job!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Having read the review, I have to say: wow, Troy. You addressed each and every point I needed addressed for me to make the judgment whether to get this one or not. It is complete, concise, and clear. Great job!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Erez</title>
		<link>http://flashofsteel.com/index.php/2009/09/15/majesty-2-review/comment-page-1/#comment-220835</link>
		<dc:creator>Erez</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Sep 2009 14:06:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://flashofsteel.com/?p=1781#comment-220835</guid>
		<description>My quip with Majesty (TOG), was that, while being an RTS, the gameplay was actually that of a watered-down City Builder. If it was, in fact a full-blown City Builder, I would&#039;ve liked it much more than what I eventually felt about it, and that it was being an RTS without the S, a city builder without the city, and an excellent idea in a so-so game. The only thing I really need to know is whether Majesty II improves on those elements, or whether it&#039;s an OK Majesty, which in that case, I&#039;d stick to the original (which I still play, occasionally, although not whole-heartedly).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>My quip with Majesty (TOG), was that, while being an RTS, the gameplay was actually that of a watered-down City Builder. If it was, in fact a full-blown City Builder, I would&#8217;ve liked it much more than what I eventually felt about it, and that it was being an RTS without the S, a city builder without the city, and an excellent idea in a so-so game. The only thing I really need to know is whether Majesty II improves on those elements, or whether it&#8217;s an OK Majesty, which in that case, I&#8217;d stick to the original (which I still play, occasionally, although not whole-heartedly).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Thomas Kiley</title>
		<link>http://flashofsteel.com/index.php/2009/09/15/majesty-2-review/comment-page-1/#comment-220832</link>
		<dc:creator>Thomas Kiley</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Sep 2009 13:18:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://flashofsteel.com/?p=1781#comment-220832</guid>
		<description>Did I just miss it or was there no mention of the multi player in the review. The only reference I could find was the &quot;This is not a game designed for replayability, multiplayer aside&quot;

Aside from that, interesting review, kind of makes me want to check out the original one.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Did I just miss it or was there no mention of the multi player in the review. The only reference I could find was the &#8220;This is not a game designed for replayability, multiplayer aside&#8221;</p>
<p>Aside from that, interesting review, kind of makes me want to check out the original one.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

